FREEFORUM

OneNews tonight: a DPI man in a good suit, very upset about "cartographic discrimination against Irad" by foreign map companies. Same channel, same suit, that will tell you next week some websites are "restricted for your protection". Which is it, gentlemen. Do you want to be seen or not?

Both. They want the world to see the ISEZ. They don't want the world to look closely at it. That is not a contradiction, that is a brochure.

They discriminate on the map; they discriminate on the ballot. At least the map company doesn't take your volunteers' names at the polling station.

Honest question nobody here likes: if the DPI tomorrow got Irad onto every map on Earth, with its own borders drawn by the DPI, would this forum celebrate? Think about which borders they'd draw.

Kobozev_Kid posted:

Think about which borders they'd draw.

The Attelkom map already answers. The valleys pale grey, no names. Discrimination when Google does it to them. Administration when they do it to us.

The DPI is right to defend the dignity of Irad abroad. This is not the same as protecting citizens from harmful websites at home. Have a nice day. Remember to vote.

A fence is dignity outside and protection inside. The horse calls it a fence.

said it in the blocked thread already but here too because this is the right board: "cartographic discrimination" when google does it, "security direction" when attelkom switches off a whole square. we were on the square. nobody drew us that week either